A sightline is the navigator’s unobstructed line from eye to mark — nothing in the way, nothing assumed, just what’s actually there. Azimuth Sightline reads a policy the same way: straight through the declarations, endorsements, and schedules to what the coverage actually says — deductibles normalized to dollars, the endorsements that cost money flagged, and never a guessed value where a verified one belongs.
Dec page, full policy, endorsement schedule, SOV — drop what you have. Sightline reads the declarations right here in your browser and fills the fields below. Confirm what it sighted, then decide: start a file, or review only.
Policyholders can run their own policy through the free Sightline Policy Check — they drop the policy, get an automated review downloaded straight to their device (“This is an automated review. Still talk to your public adjuster.”), and every drop logs to the backend’s Sightline Intake tab with the policy filed to Drive and an email ping to Ron. Share the link anywhere: azimuthapps.com/tools/sightline-check.html
The full Azimuth Sightline standard: TIV built correctly (building + BPP, rents excluded, source cited) · cost per $100 of value cross-checked against the printed rate · both deductibles captured separately — the highest applicable wind/hail (normalized from % to dollars, minimums noted) and the peril deductible labeled with its peril · per-building / per-coverage deductible clauses · admitted vs. surplus lines · towers kept to one row per risk with every layer’s carrier, limit, and attachment · and the coverage-quality flags that cost money: cosmetic damage restrictions (and how far they actually reach), ACV roof endorsements, and roof-surface exclusions.
Data discipline is the backbone: a confirmed zero is written as 0% — that’s a finding, usually the recovery argument. An unknown is a labeled REVIEW with its reason. Nothing is ever guessed into a cell.
The peril decides the reading. Selecting a peril above doesn’t just label the file — it selects the rule set that runs and suppresses the schedules that have nothing to do with the loss. A hail file does not carry an earthquake paragraph.
| Peril lens | Checks that run |
|---|---|
| Wind and hail | 11 — cosmetic restriction reach, ACV roof, roof-surface exclusion, matching, RFG→DMO, and the wind/hail deductible normalized to dollars |
| Hurricane / named storm | 11 — the wind and hail set, read against the named-storm trigger and its own deductible |
| Water — non-weather | 6 — sudden-and-accidental wording, seepage exclusion, the repair-of-the-cause carve-out |
| Fire | 6 — smoke and soot reach, ordinance or law, the standard fire policy question |
| Freeze / burst pipe | 4 — heat-maintenance and vacancy conditions, the ones that decide the claim silently |
| General review | 6 — all-perils pre-loss reading: every deductible and sublimit in the policy |
Five distinct rule sets, 33 checks. Every individual check returns one of four plain-English flags — the board reads a finding without decoding a number. The file as a whole carries the Red / Yellow / Green opportunity score on the internal document.
Needs work Open item In your favour For awareness
Sightline reads a policy in any state. What is built state by state is the authority pack — the statutes, regulations and bulletins the review actually cites, each one read to primary source and quoted verbatim. A review never cites a state it has not been built for.
| State | Pack status |
|---|---|
| Illinois | 48 of 55 fields established — 44 verified verbatim to statute or regulation and 4 verified absent (confirming a state has no such rule is itself a finding, and often the argument). 6 fields still in research, 1 flagged do-not-assert. |
| In build | The 55-field checklist is the same in every state, so each new pack is a research run, not a rebuild. Packs are added in the order the work demands them. |
Build discipline: 48 standing rulings govern how a Sightline document is assembled — each one written after a real defect was caught in a document that was about to go to a board. No finding travels without its verification. No figure appears without the document and line it came from.